Monday, April 22, 2013

Philosophy of Sport Bibliography

At the request of a reader, I am posting a bibliography of some of the essential readings in philosophy of sport. This is surely incomplete, so consider this post a starting point, and add your own suggestions in the comments section. (Thanks to Heather Reid for help on this!)

Due to time, these are not organized in any fashion. However, as a starting point I would suggest the first 3 books, one a monograph and the other two anthologies:

Jan Boxill, ed. Sports Ethics (Malden, MA:  Blackwell, 2003); Mike McNamee, ed. The Ethics of Sports:  A Reader (New York:  Routledge, 2010).
 M. Andrew Holowchak, ed. Philosophy of Sport: Critical Readings, Crucial Issues (Upper Saddle River, NJ:  Prentice Hall, 2002).
Robert L. Simon, Fair Play: Sports, Values, & Society (Boulder, CO:  Westview, 1991- several revised editions of this also are available).


Johan Huizinga, Homo Ludens:  A Study of the Play Element in Culture (Boston:  Beacon Press, 1955 [1944]).
Roger Caillois, Man, Play, and Games, trans. Meyer Berlash (Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2001 [1958]).
John W. Loy, Jr.  “The Nature of Sport: A Definitional Effort,” Quest 10:1 (May, 1968), 1-15. 
Bernard Suits, “What Is A Game?” Philosophy of Science 34:1 (June, 1967), 148-156.
Bernard Suits, The Grasshopper: Games, Life, and Utopia (Toronto:  University of Toronto Press, 1978).
Allen V. Sapora and Elmer D. Mitchell, The Theory of Play & Recreation (New York:  The Ronald Press Co., 1961).
Eleanor Metheny, “This ‘Thing’ Called Sport,” Journal of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation 40 (March 1969), 59-60.
James W. Keating, “Sportsmanship as a Moral Category,” Ethics 75 (October, 1964), 25-35.
Howard S. Slusher, Man, Sport, and Existence (Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1967).
Earle F. Zeigler, Philosophical Foundations for Physical, Health, and Recreation Education (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall,1964).
Paul Weiss, Sport:  A Philosophic Inquiry (Carbondale, IL:  Southern Illinois University Press, 1969).
Warren P. Fraleigh, “The Philosophic Society for the Study of Sport, 1972-1983” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 10 (1984), 3-7.
R. Scott Kretchmar, “From Test to Contest: An Analysis of Two Kinds of Counterpoint in Sport” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 1 (1975), 23-30.
B.C. Postow, “Women and Masculine Sports” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 7 (1980), 51-58.
Craig Lehman, “Can Cheaters Play the Game?” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 8 (1981), 41-46.
Warren P. Fraleigh, Right Actions in Sport:  Ethics for Contestants (Champaign, IL:  Human Kinetics, 1984).
William J. Morgan, Leftist Theories of Sport: A Critique and Reconstruction (Chicago:  U. of Illinois Press, 1994).
Drew A. Hyland, Philosophy of Sport (New York:  Paragon House, 1990); Heather L. Reid, The Philosophical Athlete (Durham, NC:  Carolina Academic Press, 2002).
R. Scott Kretchmar, Practical Philosophy of Sport (Champaign, IL:  Human Kinetics, 1994).
Sheryle Bergman Drewe, Why Sport? (Toronto:  Thompson, 2003).
William J. Morgan, Klaus V. Meier, and Angela, J. Schneider, editors.  Ethics in Sport ( Champaign, IL:  Human Kinetics, 2001) with a second edition in 2007; 
Mike McNamee, “Sport, Ethics and Philosophy:  Context, History and Prospects” Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1:1 (2007): 5.
Heather L. Reid, “Athletic virtue:  between East and West,” Sport Ethics and Philosophy 4:1 (2010): 16-26.
Mike McNamee, Sports, Virtues and Vices (Routledge, 2008)
William J;. Morgan, Why Sports Morally Matter (New York: Routledge, 2006).

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Human Hands Evolved So We Could Box...

..according the the New ScientistDavid Carrier at the University of Utah suggests that the opposable thumb didn't so much give our ancestors an advantage in tool making and manipulation, but rather enabled the creation of a fist utilising the thumb as a buttress which produces greater striking force.


Somehow, I'm sceptical.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Not quite the trolley problem . . .

but still a good dilemma.

Popovich angers Stern by resting Spurs' stars, but it's the right call

I love a good ethical dilemma, and Gregg Popovich gave us a great one Thursday night. He benched four of his top players -- Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker and Danny Green -- for a national TV game against the Miami Heat.

Popovich has benched Duncan numerous times before, because while they may build a statue of Duncan one day, they don't want him to play like one in May. But Parker is 30. Green is 25. What kind of a world is this when a 25-year-old professional basketball player needs rest? Go tell the guys on the 5 a.m. shift at the nearest assembly line that Green needed to rest.

Before the opening tip, this looked like an unofficial forfeit -- giving up one game to improve your chances of winning the next.

It seemed to go against the one fundamental principle we hold for all our sports: Everybody must try.

But did it?

Or was Popovich not only within his rights, but simply right?
Read more at http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/michael_rosenberg/11/29/spurs-gregg-popovich-right-resting-starters/index.html#ixzz2DoinIAaR .

Friday, September 28, 2012

CFA: Fandom, Fantasy, and Fitness

Call for Abstracts
Fandom, Fantasy, and Fitness
The 2nd Annual Rockford College Sports Studies Symposium
Date: April 19, 2013
Grace Roper Lounge
Rockford College
5050 E. State. St.
Rockford, IL 61108

Fans play a central role at all levels and within various aspects of sport, so any study of sport would do well to consider their influences in connection to fandom, fantasy, and fitness. A specific and growing area of fandom, fantasy sports, illustrates a concrete and complex way fans relate to and even affect sport. Moreover, the implicit and explicit connection of sport to fitness offers another important way that fans interact with sport. This year’s symposium seeks to explore and examine these aspects of the relationship between fan and sport.

We invite scholars from all disciplines to submit an abstract on these themes. This symposium will then bring together several panels of scholars to discuss these themes. The focus of each panel will depend, in part, on the submitted abstracts. Each presenter on a panel will have 20 minutes for their presentation. This will be followed by 30 minutes of a combined Q&A.

Abstract Submission:
Submissions are welcome on this theme of Fandom, Fantasy, and Fitness, or other related issues arising in the study of Sport. Abstract should be 300-500 words. Send via email (as PDF) to SSS13@Rockford.edu
Deadline: Friday, January 25th, 2013.
Notification of Acceptance: Monday, February 4th, 2013.

If you have any questions, please email SSS13@Rockford.edu, contact Shawn Klein (Assistant Professor, Philosophy Department) at 815-226-4115, or Michael Perry (Assistant Professor, English Department) at 815-226-4098.

Friday, September 21, 2012

The Philosophy of Running

See this link for an upcoming conference on the philosophy of running.

And see this link for a book (my book, couldn't resist) on this theme.

Here are some more details about the conference:

The University of Sheffield, in collaboration with the Open University and the Royal Institute of Philosophy, is organising two public events for philosophers and runners, and interested public, dedicated to an exploration of the philosophy of running.
Questions that will undoubtedly arise include, Why run? What sort of value does running have?  What might running tell us about intentions and effort? What is philosophically distinctive about running?
Each event will include talks by a couple of running philosophers (see who we are). And then a roundtable discussion with the great and the good from the running community (see the Sheffield Event and the Brighton Event).
The events are free.
… but it’d be good if you can register so we make sure we have enough coffee and cake.