Readers might be interested in this Research Topic: 'Sport and the Politics of In/Equality' in the journal, Frontiers in Sociology.
It is open for submissions until April 27. More on the journal's Research Topics.
This topic is run by Andy Smith of Edghill University, and Elizabeth Pike of the University of Hertfordshire.
Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label equality. Show all posts
Thursday, January 11, 2018
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
The Olympics and Philosophy: Publication Announcement
The Olympics and Philosophy is now available in physical and Kindle formats. The book is divided into 6 parts: The Ideal Olympian, Ancient Heritage, Modern Ideals, Ethical Issues, Race and Gender Issues, and Political Power. The chapters include Olympic figures Jesse Owens, Emil Zatopek, Tommie Smith, John Carlos, and Wilma Rudolph and philosophers Jane English, Aristotle, and Edmund Husserl, among others. There are discussions of Olympic boxing, soccer/football, women's beach volleyball, and various athletic events.
From the publisher's description:
It is said the champions of the ancient Olympic Games
received a crown of olive leaves, symbolizing a divine blessing from
Nike, the winged goddess of victory. While the mythology of the ancient
games has come to exemplify the highest political, religious, community,
and individual ideals of the time, the modern Olympic Games, by
comparison, are widely known as an international, bi-annual sporting
event where champions have the potential to earn not only glory for
their country, but lucrative endorsement deals and the perks of
worldwide fame. The Olympics and Philosophy examines the Olympic
Movement from a variety of theoretical perspectives to uncover the
connection between athleticism and philosophy for a deeper appreciation
of the Olympic Pillars of Sport, Environment, and Culture.
While today's Olympic champions are neither blessed by the gods nor rewarded with wreaths of olive, the original spirit and ancient ideals of the Olympic Movement endure in its modern embodiment. Editors Heather L. Reid and Michael W. Austin have assembled a team of international scholars to explore topics such as the concept of excellence, ethics, doping, gender, and race. Interweaving ancient and modern Olympic traditions, The Olympics and Philosophy considers the philosophical implications of the Games' intersection with historical events and modern controversy in a unique analysis of tradition and the future of the Olympiad.
While today's Olympic champions are neither blessed by the gods nor rewarded with wreaths of olive, the original spirit and ancient ideals of the Olympic Movement endure in its modern embodiment. Editors Heather L. Reid and Michael W. Austin have assembled a team of international scholars to explore topics such as the concept of excellence, ethics, doping, gender, and race. Interweaving ancient and modern Olympic traditions, The Olympics and Philosophy considers the philosophical implications of the Games' intersection with historical events and modern controversy in a unique analysis of tradition and the future of the Olympiad.
Monday, January 10, 2011
Justice and College Athletics
A recent column addresses this issue: http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/01/09/greene.pay.college.athletes/index.html?hpt=C2
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Sport and Social Progress
This is a nice column by Howard Bryant on ESPN.com, dealing with attitudes towards women and the recent episodes involving Tiger Woods and Ben Roethlisberger. It is hopeful that some progress has been made here with respect to attitudes towards women, but as Bryant points out, we've got a ways to go.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
If you let me play...
Readers of this blog may find this post about sports and Title IX of interest.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Equity of prize money in tennis...
Although it's not a particularly new area of debate, David Edmonds on the University of Oxford Practical Ethics blog has recently written a post arguing against the claim that women and men should receive the same prize money in tennis. His main syllogism is that prize money should be dependent on ability, men have greater ability than women, therefore men should receive more prize money than women. He does concede that there is a degree of personal interest involved in his claim in that any counter-argument resting on the premise that women should receive extra advantage in their 'handicap' [my word not his] by virtue of sex, would descriminate against him as a less tennis-abled man.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
